Research Publication: Identifying and Picking a Quality LGFV


28 May 2020

    HONG KONG, 28 May 2020. Pengyuan International has today published a report on identifying and picking a quality LGFV. Local governments in China started actively setting up local government financing vehicles (LGFVs) after they were barred from direct borrowing under a 1994 budget law. However, each LGFV operates within the jurisdiction of its respective local government, and do not directly compete against each other. Under a typical LGFV structure, a local government injects assets, usually in the form of land or cash, to capitalise a legal entity that will subsequently raise funds via bank loans, bonds, or the shadow banking market, and undertakes infrastructure investments for public welfare and/or primary land development in its coverage area. In this article, we try to analyse the common characteristics of a quality LGFV.

    Dominant exposure in public welfare. The core business of a LGFV is to provide financing for the local government to conduct infrastructure construction for public social welfare and primary land development, which we see as credit positive. Some LGFVs may also be involved in semi-social welfare sectors: public utilities that includes water, electricity, gas, heat and public transport. However, there is a growing trend for LGFVs to engage in more market-oriented businesses, including property development (residential, commercial and industrial), which we see as a potential risk if they have significant exposure in the same way a developer has. LGFV’s primary aim is to perform government functions rather than seeking profit. In order to differentiate a LGFV from an ordinary state-owned enterprise (SOE), we believe the company’s exposure to the public social welfare sector is the most important criterion. In other words, we assess whether the source of its income and operating cash inflows come from governments or the markets.

    Factors affecting the credit profile of a LGFV. We see a number of factors that could have an impact on the credit profile of a LGFV: a) In general, the higher the government administrative level, the better the credit of a LGFV; b) We prefer a LGFV with large-scale assets, and its respective local government to have financial strength; c) We prefer LGFV’s main source of operating income to be from the local Ministry of Finance (MoF), and the major counterparty to be the local government; d) We prefer LGFVs to have quality assets (with receivables largely from the local government), profit and support records (government repurchases and government subsidies track record), and sufficient bank facilities with diverse financing channels. We provide a detailed discussion in the latter section of this report.

    No explicit mechanism for bail out. The capital needs of local governments soared in the years following the global financial crisis as they were called upon to provide economic stimulus via increased infrastructure spending. The profitability of the infrastructure projects that LGFVs invest in, however, is low, and there is no explicit mechanism for local governments to bail out the LGFVs. Contractual agreements on government service purchases are in place to support LGFV’s cashflow and earnings. On a standalone basis, most LGFVs are financially very weak. Should LGFVs extend their operations into more profitable, commercial-based businesses rather than their existing welfare-based businesses, where the LGFVs do not have any track-record, government support will be weakened.

    ANALYST CONTACTS

    Primary Analyst

    Brian Lam

    +852 3615 8339

    brian.lam@pyrating.com

    Secondary Analyst

    Jameson Zuo

    +852 3615 8341

    jameson.zuo@pyrating.com

    Committee Chair

    Tony Tang

    +852 3615 8278

    tony.tang@pyrating.com

    MEDIA ENQUIRIES 

    Charley Lui 

    +852 3615 8296

    charley.lui@pyrating.com

    RATING SERVICES ENQUIRIES

    Gloria Song

    +852 3615 8324

    gloria.song@pyrating.com

    ***********************************************

    DISCLAIMER

    Pengyuan Credit Rating (Hong Kong) Company Ltd (“Pengyuan International”, “Pengyuan”, “the Company”) prepares various credit research and related commentary (collectively “research”) in compliance with the established internal process. The Company reserves the right to amend, change, remove, publish any information on its website without prior notice and at its sole discretion.
    The research is subject to disclaimers and limitations. RESEARCH AND CREDIT RATINGS ARE NOT FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE AND MUST NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY, SELL OR HOLD ANY SECURITIES AND DO NOT ADDRESS/REFLECT MARKET VALUE OF ANY SECURITIES. USERS OF RESEARCH AND CREDIT RATINGS ARE EXPECTED TO BE TRAINED FOR INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS DECISIONS.
    This research is based solely on the public data and information available to the authors at the time of publication of this research. For the purpose of this research, the Company obtains sufficient quality factual information from public sources believed by the Company to be reliable and accurate. The Company does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or third-party verification of any information it uses in the research. The Company is not responsible for any omissions, errors or inconsistencies of the public information used in the research.
    NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY INFORMATION GIVEN OR MADE BY THE COMPANY IN ANY FORM OR MANNER. In no event shall the Company, its directors, shareholders, employees, representatives be liable to any party for any damages, expenses, fees, or losses in connection with any use of the information published by the Company.
    This research focuses on observing trends from the credit markets. This research has not been made available to any issuer prior its distribution to the public. The Company does not receive compensation for its research.
    The Company reserves the right to disseminate its research through its website, the Company’s social media pages and authorised third parties. No content published by the Company may be modified, reproduced, transferred, distributed or reverse engineered in any form by any means without the prior written consent of the Company.
    The Company’s research is not indented for distribution to, or use by, any person in a jurisdiction where such usage would infringe the law. If in doubt, please consult the relevant regulatory body or professional advisor and ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
    In the event of any dispute arising out of or in relation to our research, the Company shall have absolute discretion in all matters relating to resolving the dispute, including but not limited to the interpretation of disclaimers and policies.
    Copyright © 2020 by Pengyuan Credit Rating (Hong Kong) Company Ltd. All rights reserved.